Thursday, April 26, 2012

Cover Letter


Gabrielle Horvath
April 26, 2012
ENGL 1200-078
Tetterton
Final Project

            After rereading several of my blog posts, I found my sentences were really wordy. In some cases I was able to take out a word or two in order to make it read better, but for others I had to take out an entire sentence or two and rewrite it from scratch. The best example of this would be in my blog post about Jason Russell. In the opening line, I tried to describe what was in the Kony 2012 video but after reading it again I realized it made no sense. It even confused me! I went back and changed my opening in a way that would make sense without having to read it a few times and to one that still expressed my voice and matched with the rest of the blog. Another thing I noticed I had to change was to include more details about the media affecting people’s opinions in negative ways. The whole point of the blog posts were to tell how the media over exaggerates issues and influences the public’s opinions, but I felt I did not talk enough about it. Although I did not add giant paragraphs about it, I added in a few sentences throughout the paragraphs of each blog to make sure I fully explained how the media is affecting society.
            When I first began English last semester, I struggled with being able to meet the requirements of length in my papers. I felt I would add in fluff to make the paper longer even though it did not make sense or was not needed. Now, I think I do a much better job of organizing my papers and making sure in each paragraph I talk about ethos and give full examples and descriptions of what I mean. This allows me to meet the length requirement without having to add in fake fillers and confuse my audience with details that do not go along with my main idea. I also think I do a much better job at finding good sources that have credibility and add ethos to my papers. Instead of picking random websites that agree with my main points, I search the databases for scholarly writers and researchers. Not only does this help with my paper’s clarity, but gives me a lot more to write about.

Weather and Global Warming are as Related as Oil and Vinegar


Seymour, Julia A. "Media Use Crazy Weather to Hype Global Warming, Despite Admissions Weather Isn't Climate." Media Research Center. MRC.org. 18 Aug. 2010. Web. 20 Mar. 2012.

As an assistant editor and analyst for the Business and Media Institute of the Media Research Center, the author addresses how media hype is contributing to people's perceptions of global warming today. She explains that weather and climate are two different occurrences and that idea that wacky weather is caused by global warming still requires proof. The article also insists mainstream stories in the media, like “The New York Times,” are just as biased as websites like the “Huffington Post” which contributes to the general public’s stance on global warming. It is her opinion that the media is leading the public to believe false information about global warming and encouraging the public to express opinions that were horribly misguided. Continuing to describe how the influence of the media is encouraging the public to become “alarmists,” the author stands her ground that trying to prove global warming exists by using unrelated weather events as examples is an ignorant approach.

Tuesday, March 20, 2012

The Media: Quick to Make Famous, Quicker to Destroy


Except for some elderly adults who despise technology, there is hardly anyone with access to the Internet who has not heard of the Kony 2012 movement. The media has made it an overnight sensation with millions of viewers. Quite recently the YouTube hit video has gotten the media stamp of approval—up until now. Today when Kony 2012 is typed into Google over half of the pages that come up are about the creator of the video, Jason Russell, who was arrested for public masturbation just last week. The media is like that two-faced friend that plays both sides and is quick to turn around and stab in the back. Because of Russell’s public display of his “wee-he-woo-who,” the beliefs of a few have spiraled into the beliefs of many thanks to the media. With such a viral video also comes a big crowd of judges. Now when people hear “Kony 2012” they think of Jason Russell’s arrest and believe it is a reflection of Invisible Children. The opinions of some have been mediafied (a misleading blow up of an issue in the media) and convinced others who were once supporters of “Kony 2012” to question its credibility. It is simply amazing how fast the media can make people’s question their views, and even more incredible is how those same views are thought to be justified.
            It is an unrealistic idea to believe everyone is perfect (except Mother Teresa of course), but it is even worse to judge people’s life work on a single incident of bad judgment. There is no reason to go from being a Kony advocate one night to waking up the next morning despising Russell’s cause. Once more, the media has built up an irrational idea. The idea that one man’s personal incident should be reflect a whole group of people. The Invisible Children organization is one that has thousands of employees and millions of supporters all of which are independent of any personal decision members choose to make. A famous “Pirates of the Caribbean” quote says, “One good deed is not enough to redeem a man of a lifetime of wickedness.” In the case of Russell, one bad deed should not be enough to condemn a man of a lifetime (or eight years at least) of goodness, but the media does not care about influencing the public’s opinions.
            The capture of Joseph Kony is not any less important because the appointed “leader” of the movement had a mental breakdown. How the public views Russell after his arrest directly relates to how they view the Invisible Children organization now, but that should not be the case. Children are still being abducted, mutilated, and killed for no reason at all. It is understandable to view Jason Russell differently and take any future videos from him completely serious because of his actions (look at girlfriend beater Chris Brown), but it is a radical leap to question the organization solely with this as evidence. The media has a reputation of bring people up to a level of fame with positive attention to destroying them as soon as they screw up. 

Becker, Jacob. "Lights Shined Too Bright On Russell." Pipe Dream. 20 Mar. 2012. Web. 20 Mar. 2012.
Lights Shined too Bright on Russell 

As a writer for the Binghamton University's newspaper Pipe Dream, the author tries to explain how the pressure of the media can influence even the strongest people to break down. He uses Russell as the perfect example of how the media made him famous over night and also destroyed him in the same amount of time. The author also admits that although it is natural to not take Russel as seriously as before, it is wrong to judge the organization he represents based on his actions that night. His article talks about the way the media is now contributing to people having unjust opinions of Invisible Children. The media is using their power to keep ideas of unwarranted doubt spreading among the people and continuing to add pressure to Russell and others lives who made once bad mistake.


Because Every Viewer Wants to be Pregnant too, Right?



                        Does society really want to live out the shows they see on television or is it merely a fictitious idea brought on by media hype? MTV’s reality show “16 and Pregnant” has not only the viewers of the show talking about it, but also non-viewers. The theory behind the media madness is if young viewers watch the show, they will want to be teen parents too because the show “glamourizes” teen pregnancy. The media’s extremist views are persuading others to see things that way as well. I was never informed that fighting with a boyfriend and having no money is considered the good life now according to the media’s idea. Last time I checked I was not running around trying to get pregnant after watching a “16 and Pregnant” episode nor did I see any of my friends doing it either. Since the beginning of the first season, individual reports of how the shows “corrupt teen girls” has quickly spread to concerned parents. “I want to get pregnant, be on ‘16 and Pregnant,’ and make millions from MTV just like Kailyn and Janelle are.” This is the kind of statement parents fear their children will make, but then there is no evidence to prove this is what is happening. The only reason parents are having this idea in their heads is because it is being feed to them by the media. Being on a popular television network like MTV might have people thinking they are millionaires (Pauly D reportedly brings in thousands of dollars per episode of “Jersey Shore”—or was it each time he says "OH YEAH!"), but that is far from the honest truth.
            While it is true that in the girls’ final thoughts at the end of the show tell how their babies have given them a new joy in life, the media has used this as an example to tell parents it is encouraging their children to do what they see on television. But apparently the media has missed the second part of the statement when the teen moms say, “It has been very hard, and I wish I would have waited until after high school and college!” In one episode of “16 and Pregnant” people have received well beyond their recommended daily intake of vitamin stress and folic tears. The cast members constantly have to fight with their boyfriends for either not having a job, partying too much, or not helping out with the baby. In addition, they show the girls barely getting sleep and not being able to go to the parties they want to because they have to take care of a baby. So why has this show become so popular with teenagers? Like any reality television show, people like watching people’s sucky lives because it makes them feel better about their own. It is a way to be involved in drama without actually having to fight or cry. Teenagers would say that if anything the show makes them want to put off having children until they are financially and emotionally stable. Unlike the adults buying into the media hype, they do not agree with what it suggests.
            In the United States, teen pregnancies have been decreasing for several years now, and after watching the show a few times it is hard not to memorize the sponsored website itsyoursexlife.org. The website, started by MTV, encourages the use of contraceptive methods as well as explains the various types, and advice to teens on how to take control of their life so they do not ruin it by having a baby too early. Both MTV’s show “16 and Pregnant” and itsyoursexlife.org are supposed to go hand-in-hand to advocate the importance of using birth control and most importantly staying baby-free until after being stable. Such positive approaches on as a way to deter teen pregnancy has been met with negative media attention (like Amber’s domestic violence arrest and Janelle’s drug use) and are brainwashing the public. Because one critic thought the show promotes sex by bringing the subject up with young viewers, others have mindlessly hopped on the wagon. The media’s views have distorted the real motives behind the show. They have gathered a herd of freaked out parents that worry if their child watches the show they will want to go get knocked up. Although it is nothing but a flawed theory, the media has hyped it up as factual.

Abbott, Francie. “MTV’s 16 and Pregnant – The Controversy.” Suite 101. 3 Mar. 2010. Web. 20 Mar. 2012.

Focusing on creative writing and with a bachelors in English, the author discusses the common idea of how MTV is glamorizing teen pregnancy and how it relates to the public's views. In the article, she makes it a point to illustrate all the bad things that happen to cast members during the show. She uses this as a way to disprove the ideas many believe that the show is bad for teens. The article provides a list of many controversial questions asked about the show in the news and uses the cast’s lives as a way to discredit them. Her ideas help shine a light on the other side of the media’s view of teen corruption by “16 and Pregnant” and gives a better outlook on what teens actually watching the show feel about it.